AN ANALYSIS OF “STANCE DEVICES” IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ARTICLES BY NATIVE AND TURKISH WRITERS

References

Ağçam, R. (2015a). Author stance in doctoral dissertations of native and non-native speakers of English: A corpus-based study on epistemic adverbs. Revista de Lengues para Fines Especificos, 21(2), 98-113.
Ağçam, R. (2015b). A corpus-based study on attitudinal stance in native and nonnative academic writing. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 2 (8), 123-129.
Alghazo, S., Salem, M.N.A., Alrashdan, I. & Rabab’ah, G. (2021). Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463. Anthony, L. (2011). AntConc (Version 3.2.4). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html.
Bahrami, L., Dowlatabadi, H.R.,Yazdani, H. & Amerian, M. (2018). Authorial stance in academic writing: issues and implications for research in English language teaching. International English Language & Translation Studies, 6 (2), 69-80.
Barton, E. (1993). Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English, 55, 745-769. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Biber, D. (2004). Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 5:1, 107-136. Biber, D. & E. Finegan (1988). Adverbial stance types in English, Discourse Processes 11, 1-34.
Bonn, S.V. and Swales, J.M. (2007) English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6, 93-108
Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2016). Explicit learning of authorial stance-taking by L2 doctoral students. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 49-80.
Chen, Z. (2012). Expression of Epistemic stance in EFL Chinese university students’ writing. English Language Teaching, 5 (10), 173- 179.
Clyne, M. (1991). The sociocultural dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. In Schroder, H. (ed.) Subject-oriented texts (Research in text theory 16), 49-68. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.
Conrad, S. & D. Biber (2000). Adverbial making of stance in speech and writing. In S.Hunston and G. Tompson (eds.) Evaluation in text, 56-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crismore, A. & W. J. Vande Kopple (1997). Hedges and readers: effects on attitudes and learning. In Markkanen, R., and Schroder, H. (eds.), Hedging and discourse, approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, 83 114. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Crosthwaite, P., & Jiang, K. (2017). Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance: A longitudinal learner corpus study. System, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010.
Çakır, H. (2016). Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of Stance Adverbs in English Research Article Abstracts. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6, 85-96.
Dedaic, M. N. (2004). If I may say, I would like to ask and let me repeat: Modality-construed mitigation markers in political communication. In Fachinetti, R & Palmer, F. (eds.) English modality in perspective. Genre analysis and contrastive studies, 45-66. Germany: Peter Lang GmbH. Flottum, K., Jonasson, K. and Noren, C. (2006). ON -pronom a facettes. Akademisk Prosa 3: 87-100. Skrift er fra KIAP. Department of Romance studies, University of Bergen.
Getkham, K. (2016). Authorial stance in Thai students’ doctoral dissertation. English Language Teaching, 9 (3), 80-95.
Gillaerts, P., Velde, F.V. (2010) Interactional Meta discourse in Research Article Abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 128-139.
Graetz, N, 1985, Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In Ulign J. Mand Pugh A. K. (eds) Reading for Professional Purposes: Methods and Materials in Teaching Languages, Leuven: Acco, pp.123–135 (7) (PDF) Patterns in Scientific Abstracts.
Henderson, A. and Barr, R. (2010) Comparing indicators of authorial stance in psychology Students’ writing and published research articles. Journal of Writing Research 2 (2), 245-264.
Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 361-386.
Hunston, S. & G.Thompson (eds.) (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic meta discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters, and lexical Invisibility: Noticing modifiers in Academic texts. Language Awareness, 2 (4), 179-196.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing, Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Meta discourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133-151.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A modal of interaction in academic Discourse, Discourse Studies, 7 (2), 173-193. Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in Abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2005) 123-139.
Huo, G. and Cao, F. (2011) Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English and Chinese medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 2795-2809. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kafes, H. (2009) Authorial Stance in Academic English: Native and Non-native Academic Speaker Writers' Use of Stance Devices (Modal Verbs) In Research Articles (PhD Thesis) Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
Kafes, H. (2018). Stance in academic writing. European Journal of Education Studies, 4 (2), 1-16.
Keck, C. M. & D. Biber (2004). Modal use in spoken and written university registers: A Corpus Based study. In Fachinetti, R & Palmer, F. (eds.) English modality in perspective. Genre analysis and contrastive studies, 3-25. Germany: Peter Lang GmbH.
Khamkhien, A. (2014). Linguistic features of evaluative stance: findings from research article discussions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4 (1), 54-69.
Lewin, B.A. (2005). Hedging: An exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of 'Toning down' in scientific texts, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4,163-178.
Martin-Martin, P. (2003) A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes 22, 25-43.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 280-302.
Martinez, I. A. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purpose, 20, 227-247.
Martinez, I.A. (2005) Native and non-native writers' use of first-person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing14, 174-190.
Min, S., Paek, J.J. & Kang, Y. (2019). Exploring the use of hedges and stance devices in relation to Korean EFL learners’ argumentative writing qualities. English Teaching, 74 (1), 3-23.
Mofian, F., Talati-Baghsiahi, A. & Yaramadzhezi, N. (2014). Modal auxiliaries as stance-taking devices in linguistics research articles: a functional contrastive analysis. Linguistik online, 91 (4/18), 59-77.
Pho, P.D. (2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies Vol 10 (2):231-250. Rezzano, N. S. (2004). Modality and modal responsibility in research articles in English. In Fachinetti, R & Palmer, F. (eds.) English modality in perspective. Genre analysis and contrastive studies, 101-118. Germany: Peter Lang GmbH.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A Text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and Modality distribution in medical English Abstracts, English for Specific Purposes, 11, 93-113. Salager-Meyer, F. (1998). Language is not a physical object. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 295-302. Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21 (1), 1-17.
Seyri, H.& Rezaei, S. (2021). Disciplinary and cross-cultural variation of stance and engagement markers in soft and hard sciences research articles by native English and Iranian academic writers: a corpus-based analysis. ISELT, 1 (1), 1-22.
Shirzadi, M., Akhgar, F., Rooholamin, A. & Shafiee, S. (2017). A corpus-based contrastive analysis of stance strategies in native and nonnative speakers’ English academic writings: introduction and discussion sections in focus. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2 (4), 30-40.
Stotesbury, H. (2003) Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2, 327-341. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis, English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. &Feak, C. B. (2000). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: English in today's research world. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press. Zhang, L. & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Fostering stance-taking as a sustainable goal in developing EFL students’ academic writing skills: exploring the effects of explicit instruction on academic writing skills and stance deployment. Sustainability, 13,4270, 1-20. Widdowson, H. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19 (1). 119-148.